All Activity

Satın almış olduğum bir domain var bunu sizin hostinginizle eşleştirmek istiyorum domain ekleme bölümünü bulamadım ve asıl ekleyeceğimi bilmiyorum.

i know but alone just integrating something like WHMCS via Softacoulus or even any panel customization would already be a huge plus and wouldnt cost like any time. they just used Vanilla MOFH Package and called it a day which i think is kinda sad for the official Free Hosting

I think that's the point, they mainly do Premium Hosting, and make premium Hosting better. For free hosting, they leave it for Mofh resellers because they do not have time for it. Free Hosting is "just there." And every Mofh resellers has to promote iFN premium, gaining more customers from that. I bet infinity free brings more iFN customers then iFN themselves. They don't need a huge marketing team.

I tested byet now a month or so and honestly, for that this is the official Free Hosting its not that good. it just comes with the standard vPanel with no customization whatsoever. not even a client area like WHMCS, Xera or anything different, like it doesnt even cost anything. Xera is open source and WHMCS you already have a license for / you could also use the free WHMCS License which is even integrated in Softaculous. Any big MOFH Reseller has more features than this like Free SSL, Website Builder etc. Like take TinkerHost or bixa.app as an example, great features like Site.pro, free ssl, clean ui etc. like compared to them this is just sad. So much lost potential

Why should anyone do this? This would only decrease the experience for the Users, if you want a limit you can always do it on your own Hosting but i dont see the point for why this should be a standard.

1. You wanted opinion. That is what the topic is for. PM'ing people just to "promote" your topic is misuse of the PM system, and can be a banned offense. 2. Having a PM list for such misuse, also can be a banned offense. Cease and desist such lists and actions. This IS your warning.

This is a different point entirely (and also one I disagree with). Limiting SSL certificates should NEVER EVER be done, however limiting connected domains can be done (I think this is an MOFH option if you want to do it yourself), but it just makes the free hosting platform even less usable, so strong disagree. Don’t ever do that again. It’s advertising. If I was a mod here I would petition to give you a final warning on the subject, with a future violation being an immediate permanent ban. It’s incredibly annoying, unwarranted, etc. just post your post and I’ll see it when I check this forum (Which is usually every other day or so).

This, 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000%

Basic security should be free at no cost. Byet already does not offer certificate chains, there is a reason to upgrade already. There is also auto renewal which is a paid only feature (iFN or TH+), another reason to upgrade. And without free TLS certs many would not use the service.

3 websites for free is enough, I think the service should survive so we need to access some websites. The reason I PMed you guys is because I wanted your opinion, tinkerman I can remove you from the PM list now, since you have seen the thread.

I am very strongly against adding any more limits then need be, a website without SSL is unusable in the modern world, and limiting certificates that are free in the first place would be a huge negative, not a positive. Also, don’t DM people with your topics, we will look at it when we see it, I don’t appreciate advertisements in my inbox.

We had an discussion in another thread about SSL certs, on some of the webhosting sites you can get unlimited certs, some a few, some only 1. The reason I say that Ifastnet and byethost should limit the SSL certs is so the company can gain money and still be able to offer the premium service, else you cannot gain any money, it's a matter of money question. Elsewise the control panel in Myownfreehost is better than most ones out there, it has Scriptacolus and FTP etc which is awesome, if someone wanna secure more than 3 sites they should upgrade to premium so byethost can gain money and still offer free hosting, anybody agrees or disagree? Not everything comes for free, other hosts has learned this by the years. I've tested some of them, and Infinityfree is one of the best, or Spookhost or Tinkerhost if you want a stable website use one of these which are known, and not gonna be put down. Some people should be happy that they even get to host something, and that their website can succeed anyways with some limits.

thank you guys so much it finally works 🙏

I was viewing it from an iFN perspective, they require their nameservers to be set on the domain in order for it to be added. I also read the OPs statement incorrectly so that contributed to by incorrectness as well. But yeah, DNS NS and nameservers are the same thing, but PSL does matter when a service restricts you down to only adding a root domain name. I thought I remembered someone coming to a conclusion that iFN did do PSL checks for some free hosting stuff (And very badly tried to communicate that in my last post). OP, read this, it is correct and is your next step assuming that the domain is actually connected. If it still does not work after 72 hours / DNS cache clear and verification, see my above speculation about iFN and PSL:

That is not correct. Actually, the NS records for your domain are exactly the same ones you could add for a subdomain, just in the root zone. And even tho its not his intention, yes, this would work for clients too. For DNS, there is not really any difference between example.org test.example.example.org as long as you set NS records. Only cloudflare blocks you from adding such a subdomain to their network. If you e.g. set NS records, you can host a subdomain with its own DNS entirely as you wish on dns.he.net (last time i checked they allowed domains not on the PSL). DNS doesnt care about the PSL. Its mainly cloudflare that does, and webbrowsers. The CNAME record you added only verifies that the domain is allowed to be added to byet hosting. However, you still need to setup DNS records. In Cloudflare, create following records: hosting.cheater.de A 185.27.134.175 www.hosting.cheater.de A 185.27.134.175 This IP might change in the future. You can always see the IP here: https://digwebinterface.com/?hostnames=hosting.cheeter.de&type=&short=on&useresolver=9.9.9.10&ns=self&nameservers=ns1.byet.org That is also why its reccomended to set the NS records.

i dont wanna use this domain for client accounts, basically i have a domain "site.cheeter.de" to register (username.site.cheeter.de) and i wanna use hosting.cheeter.de only as the homepage, i did it this way so clients cant register hosting.cheeter.de. i then tried adding the hosting.cheeter.de via CNAME which worked but didnt show any content on the page.

That domain is not on the PSL. While you can add DNS NS records, you can’t add nameservers records (which are what is required). Even if you could get it setup with the domain, you certainly would not be able to use it for client accounts as any domain users create would not work. just buy a separate domain for the hosting platform or use the base domain name. The system is a bit rickety, doing something wrong will probably break something major at some point.

The Support just says i need to add the Domain "cheeter.de" for this to work but it worked before without that domain so i think it should also work this way. before i did it with "hosting.cheeter.de" as NS but deleted it for reasons, i wanted to add it with CNAME which worked but didnt show anything like said before.

i connected to my MOFH Account the domain "hosting.cheeter.de" via CNAME, but when i try to open the site it just doesnt show any Content. i waited several weeks but still, nothing. idk what to try anymore, i tried reconnecting it, delete the files, all of that but still didnt work.

What do you want us to do? We don’t know anything other then you stated, so unless someone here as a magic wand, there is nothing we can do for you unless you provide way more information then “it does not work”. what does not work? What is the error? Where is the error? What have you done to try to fix the error?

J'ai hébergé mon site internet. Ça marche sur mon téléphone mais quand je donne le lien aux amis, ça ne fonctionne pas TRANSLATION: (Please use English here.) I hosted my website. It works on my phone, but when I give the link to my friends, it doesn't work.

The issue was as BastelPichi mentioned; since I was connecting from Turkey, HTTP requests were being blocked. The problem was resolved when I installed a certificate on the site. Thanks.

The IP is from a turkish provider. This is probably either some issue with your ISP, or more likely some 3rd party script you have in your site (e.g. ad network).

Not bad! However I would right recommend a landing page instead of just a signup form, it helps people understand what you are offering, and helps search engines (hopefully) rank you higher for your keywords