Honestly, not that good

[kuki]

I tested byet now a month or so and honestly, for that this is the official Free Hosting its not that good. it just comes with the standard vPanel with not even a own branding. Any big MOFH Reseller has more features than this like Free SSL, Website Builder etc. Like take TinkerHost.net or alwaysfreehost.com as an example, great features like Site.pro, free ssl etc. like compared to them this is just sad. So much lost potential

Edited April 24 by kuki

[SpookyKipper]

I think that's the point, they mainly do Premium Hosting, and make premium Hosting better.

For free hosting, they leave it for Mofh resellers because they do not have time for it. Free Hosting is "just there." And every Mofh resellers has to promote iFN premium, gaining more customers from that. 

I bet infinity free brings more iFN customers then iFN themselves. They don't need a huge marketing team.

[kuki]

i know but alone just integrating something like WHMCS via Softacoulus or even any panel customization would already be a huge plus and wouldnt cost like any time. they just used Vanilla MOFH Package and called it a day which i think is kinda sad for the official Free Hosting

[TinkerMan]

On 4/22/2025 at 4:42 AM, kuki said:

plus and wouldnt cost like any time

It would though. vP is comply custom, it’s not “grab an API key and it works”, it would take multiple weeks to improve the current system. And they don’t care (and there really is no reason to) since resellers like IF and TH have custom systems that will be better than anything iFN themselves can make in a month. And since the core service is exactly the same, iFN gets no additional revenue, there is pretty much no point in adding more competition, as they would just be doing a bunch of hard work to compete with themselves. 

[BastelPichi]

Also, WHMCS barely provides any extra value to MOFH, besides not beeing compatible pretty much at all at this point, and requiring a whole lot of work.

To get Xera to an efficient and secure state would take quite a lot of work. Youll also have to imagine the additional server load itd cost them. iFastNet hosts millions, if not billions of pages.

 

If they really want a new feature, they can just implement it into vPanel, which would be the proper way of doing it in the first place. But since they still want to promote paid hosting, they obviously wont do that.

 

iFastNet offers some of the most generous Free Hosting. Its free - dont complain about it (especially since they still allow these features to be implemented externally)

[kuki]

On 4/23/2025 at 11:19 AM, TinkerMan said:

It would though. vP is comply custom, it’s not “grab an API key and it works”, it would take multiple weeks to improve the current system.

thats not what i meant, i meant like just adding their logo in the top like literally any MOFH Host or just something via the panel adverts feature like tinkerhost / BobTheCow or Alc Hosting has like a little welcoming message or smth.

 

19 hours ago, BastelPichi said:

Also, WHMCS barely provides any extra value to MOFH, besides not beeing compatible pretty much at all at this point, and requiring a whole lot of work.

To get Xera to an efficient and secure state would take quite a lot of work. Youll also have to imagine the additional server load itd cost them. iFastNet hosts millions, if not billions of pages.

Yea then maybe not a client area.